Holloway v. Judge Schaltz
Walter Holloway |
Judge Schaltz |
8:2023cv00192 |
May 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CORRESPONDENCE on behalf of Plaintiff Walter Holloway.(NMW) |
Filing 11 CORRESPONDENCE on behalf of Plaintiff Walter Holloway.(NMW) |
Filing 10 CORRESPONDENCE on behalf of Plaintiff Walter Holloway. (TCL) |
Filing 9 CORRESPONDENCE on behalf of Plaintiff Walter Holloway.(NMW) |
Filing 8 CORRESPONDENCE on behalf of Plaintiff Walter Holloway.(NMW) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defects on or before July 3, 2023. To be clear, Plaintiff must file a signed copy of his Complaint. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: July 3, 2023: deadline for signed Complaint.Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(NMW) |
Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable addressed to Walter Holloway, 1117 Nicholas Street, Omaha, NE 68102 regarding Notice by Clerk (Pro Se Case) #3 , Order - Pro Se GO 2022-04, #4 . Mail, including filing 5 , resent to Walter Holloway, 1702 Nicholas St., Omaha, NE 68102. (NMW) |
Filing 5 TEXT NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY by Deputy Clerk that the Complaint - Pro Se #1 has been filed and is considered deficient because the document is not signed. The plaintiff shall correct the deficiency within 14 days of the date of this entry or the pleading may be stricken from the record of this case. See NECivR 11.1.(NMW) |
Filing 4 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(NMW) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (NMW) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Walter Holloway.(NMW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Judge Schaltz filed on behalf of Walter Holloway, Singer (NMW) Modified on 5/15/2023 to reflect correct party filers (NMW). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Holloway v. Judge Schaltz | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Walter Holloway | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Judge Schaltz | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.