Hower v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Plaintiff: James Hower
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Case Number: 8:2023cv00206
Filed: May 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Brian C Buescher
Referring Judge: Michael D Nelson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The deadline for Plaintiff to file a brief in opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #6 is extended to July 19, 2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
June 22, 2023 Filing 9 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Deadline to File Response to Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #6 by Attorney Laura Baures on behalf of Plaintiff James Hower.(Baures, Laura)
June 13, 2023 Filing 8 DECLARATION regarding MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #6 by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Moore, Scott)
June 13, 2023 Filing 7 BRIEF in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #6 by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co..(Moore, Scott)
June 13, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co..(Moore, Scott)
May 24, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. on 5/23/2023. (Kaster, James)
May 19, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JES)
May 19, 2023 Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES)
May 19, 2023 Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Union Pacific Railroad Co. regarding Complaint #1 . (Baures, Laura)
May 19, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Union Pacific Railroad Co. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4867794), by Attorney Laura Baures on behalf of James Hower (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Medical Rules)(Baures, Laura)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hower v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Hower
Represented By: James H. Kaster
Represented By: Laura Baures
Represented By: Lucas J. Kaster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Represented By: Scott P. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?