Hower v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
James Hower |
Union Pacific Railroad Co. |
8:2023cv00206 |
May 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Brian C Buescher |
Michael D Nelson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The deadline for Plaintiff to file a brief in opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #6 is extended to July 19, 2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN) |
Filing 9 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Deadline to File Response to Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #6 by Attorney Laura Baures on behalf of Plaintiff James Hower.(Baures, Laura) |
Filing 8 DECLARATION regarding MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #6 by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Moore, Scott) |
Filing 7 BRIEF in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #6 by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co..(Moore, Scott) |
Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co..(Moore, Scott) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. on 5/23/2023. (Kaster, James) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JES) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Union Pacific Railroad Co. regarding Complaint #1 . (Baures, Laura) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Union Pacific Railroad Co. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4867794), by Attorney Laura Baures on behalf of James Hower (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Medical Rules)(Baures, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hower v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James Hower | |
Represented By: | James H. Kaster |
Represented By: | Laura Baures |
Represented By: | Lucas J. Kaster |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co. | |
Represented By: | Scott P. Moore |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.