Solomon v. Allstate Insurance Idemnity Policy 000000886169059
| Ava Solomon |
| Allstate Insurance Idemnity Policy 000000886169059 |
| 8:2023cv00207 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION for Hearing ALLSTATE INSURANCE on behalf of Plaintiff Ava Solomon.(Solomon, Ava) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE to Take Deposition of ALLSTATE INSURANCE CASUALITY ADJSTOR CLAIM 0712542810 C/O ARMANI WILLIAMS on behalf of Plaintiff Ava Solomon (Solomon, Ava) |
| Filing 11 Certificate regarding SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Intervene #8 ALLSTATE on behalf of Plaintiff Ava Solomon. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit ORIGINAL DOCUMENT, #2 Affidavit ORIGINAL DOCUMENT)(Solomon, Ava) |
| Filing 10 DISCLAIMER regarding SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Intervene #8 ALLSTATE on behalf of Plaintiff Ava Solomon. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order PLACE ON CALENDAR, #2 Affidavit RECORDS OF NOTICE, #3 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases NOTICE PLACE ON CALENDAR, #4 Transmittal Letter CALENDAR TRIAL DATE, #5 Affidavit CERTIFIED NOTICE AND RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDFED, #6 Supplement ROE VS WADE INSURED LIFE OR NOT)(Solomon, Ava) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Judge Summon Allstate to Mediate Prior to trial date on calendar on behalf of Plaintiff Ava Solomon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases, #5 Exhibit)(Solomon, Ava) |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Intervene on behalf of Plaintiff Ava Solomon. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Nebrasika Mediation Request, #2 Affidavit Nebraska Mediation Request)(Solomon, Ava) |
| Remark - Public: CM/ECF NextGen e-filing request from pro se plaintiff Ava Solomon received. Access granted on 6/15/23. (JLS) |
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Clerk of the Court return the attached materials to Plaintiff Ava Solomon. The Court warns Plaintiff that if she wishes to file a document in this Court, such filing must be made via hand delivery, United States postal mail, or by registering for electronic case filing (CM/ECF) access. A document faxed or e-mailed to the Clerk or the undersigned will be returned to Plaintiff and will not be filed. (Attachments: #1 Fax #1, #2 Fax #2, #3 Fax #3) Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff's initial motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Filing No. #2 , is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff's second motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Filing No. #3 , is denied as moot. Plaintiff is advised that although the Court accepted her Complaint and motions she submitted by facsimile, pursuant to NECivR 5.1(c) of this Court "[a] document faxed or e-mailed to the clerk or assigned judge is not considered filed without a court order." As such, Plaintiff is hereby notified that all future filings she makes into this case must be made via hand delivery, United States postal mail, or by registering for electronic case filing ("CM/ECF") access. See NEGenR 1.3(b). Plaintiff is further advised that the next step in her case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of her claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM)
|
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (LRM) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Ava Solomon.(LRM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Ava Solomon.(LRM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Allstate Insurance Idemnity Policy 000000886169059 filed on behalf of Ava Solomon. (LRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Solomon v. Allstate Insurance Idemnity Policy 000000886169059 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ava Solomon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Allstate Insurance Idemnity Policy 000000886169059 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
