Cox v. City of Omaha et al
Plaintiff: Travis Cox
Defendant: City of Omaha, Omaha Police Department, Charles Sweeney, Joseph Salerno, Douglas County Department of Corrections and Douglas County
Case Number: 8:2023cv00241
Filed: June 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Bataillon
Referring Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, Filing No. #15 , and motion for a copy of the docket sheet, Filing No. #16 , are denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM)
July 12, 2023 Filing 16 MOTION Requesting Docket Sheet on behalf of Plaintiff Travis Cox. (LKO)
July 12, 2023 Filing 15 MOTION to Grant Judgment by Default on behalf of Plaintiff Travis Cox. (LKO)
July 12, 2023 Filing 14 Civil Cover Sheet on behalf of Plaintiff Travis Cox. (LKO)
July 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP, Filing No. #2 , is granted. Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $47.20 within 30 days unless the Court extends the time in which he has to pay in response to a written motion. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff's institution must collect the additional monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and forward those payments to the Court. The Clerk's office is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiff's institution. The Clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: August 4, 2023: initial partial filing fee payment due. Plaintiff is advised that, following payment of the initial partial filing fee, the next step in Plaintiff's case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff's claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Plaintiff's Motion to Produce Financial Records, Filing No. #4 , is denied as moot. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, Filing No. #8 , is granted to the extent the Court will consider the motion as supplemental to the Complaint, Filing No. #1 . The Clerk's office is directed to update the docket text for Filing No. #8 to reflect that it is a Supplement to the Complaint. The Clerk's office is further directed to add "Douglas County Department of Corrections" and "Douglas County" as defendants in this matter pursuant to Filing No. #8 and this order. Plaintiff's Motion for Summons, Filing No. #9 , and "Motion to Use U.S. Marshalls as summons service method," Filing No. #12 , are denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
June 26, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION to use U.S. Marshalls as summons service method on behalf of Plaintiff Travis Cox.(LRM)
June 26, 2023 Filing 11 LETTER with clerk's response on behalf of Plaintiff Travis Cox. (JES)
June 23, 2023 Filing 10 PRISONER ACCOUNT CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Travis Cox. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LRM)
June 8, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION for summons on behalf of Plaintiff Travis Cox. (LRM)
June 8, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to file an amended complaint on behalf of Plaintiff Travis Cox. (LRM)
June 5, 2023 Filing 7 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. Letter sent to Douglas County Corrections. (LKO)
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
June 5, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
June 5, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION to Produce Financial Records on behalf of Plaintiff Travis Cox. (LKO)
June 5, 2023 Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT on behalf of Plaintiff Travis Cox. (LKO)
June 5, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Travis Cox. (LKO)
June 5, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Omaha, Omaha Police Department, Joseph Salerno, and Charles Sweeney filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Travis Cox. (LKO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cox v. City of Omaha et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Travis Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Omaha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Omaha Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Sweeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Salerno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas County Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?