Mons v. United States of America
United States of America |
Pascal A. Mons |
8:2023cv00243 |
June 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Brian C Buescher |
Cheryl R Zwart |
Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party |
26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Internal Revenue Service on 6/6/23 as to defendant United States of America. (Eisenstat, Benjamin) Modified on 6/7/2023 to reflect date of service(ADB). |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Attorney General on 6/6/23 as to defendant United States of America. (Eisenstat, Benjamin) Modified on 6/7/2023 to reflect date of service(ADB). |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon U.S. Attorney on 6/6/23 as to defendant United States of America (Eisenstat, Benjamin) Modified on 6/7/2023 to reflect date of service and name of defendant (ADB). |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to defendant United States of America. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LKO) |
Filing 7 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice #4 for attorney Benjamin Z. Eisenstat. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LKO) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice #3 for attorney Niles A. Elber. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LKO) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ANEDC-4876727 by Attorney Benjamin Z. Eisenstat on behalf of Petitioner Pascal A Mons. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Eisenstat, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ANEDC-4876724 by Attorney Niles A. Elber on behalf of Petitioner Pascal A Mons. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Elber, Niles) |
Filing 2 Summons Requested as to United States of America regarding Motion to Quash #1 . (Elber, Niles) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Quash IRS Summons ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4876687), by Attorney Niles A. Elber on behalf of Pascal A Mons (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Elber, Niles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mons v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Pascal A. Mons | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Z. Eisenstat |
Represented By: | Niles A. Elber |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.