Cooke v. Randolph, Nebraska City Council et al
Kandice Cooke and Kandice Louise Cooke |
Randolph, Nebraska City Council and The City of Randolph, Nebraska |
8:2023cv00249 |
June 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
John M Gerrard |
Cheryl R Zwart |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order city to cease and desist harassment on behalf of Plaintiff Kandice Louise Cooke. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Cooke, Kandice) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Mark D. Fitzgerald on behalf of Defendants Randolph, Nebraska City Council, The City of Randolph, Nebraska (Fitzgerald, Mark) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE regarding Response #10 addendum on behalf of Plaintiff Kandice Louise Cooke. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Cooke, Kandice) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Defendant's motion to dismiss on behalf of Plaintiff Kandice Louise Cooke. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(Cooke, Kandice) |
PART 2 of 2 - MOTION to Dismiss by Attorney Keelan P. Holloway on behalf of Defendants Randolph, Nebraska City Council, The City of Randolph, Nebraska.(JLS) |
Filing 9 PART 1 of 2 - AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint regarding: Complaint - Pro Se #1 , Order,, #8 by Randolph, Nebraska City Council (Holloway, Keelan) Modified on 7/6/2023 to reflect there are two parts to this document. (JLS) |
Filing 8 ORDER- The plaintiff's "letter" (filing #7 ) is construed as a motion for The defendants shall respond to that motion, pursuant to NECivR 7.1(b)(1)(B), on or before July 5, 2023. The plaintiff may reply in support of her motion, pursuant to NECivR 7.1(c) (1), on or before July 12, 2023. The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this order to: City Administrator/Clerk, City of Randolph, 212 E. Broadway St., PO Box 457, Randolph, NE 68771. Ordered by Senior Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copies mailed as directed)(MKR) |
Filing 7 LETTER on behalf of Plaintiff Kandice Louise Cooke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cooke, Kandice) |
Remark - Public: CM/ECF NextGen e-filing request from pro se plaintiff Kandice Louise Cooke received. Access granted on 6/16/23. (JLS) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant The City of Randolph, Nebraska on 6/6/2023. (TCL) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Randolph, Nebraska City Council on 6/6/2023. (TCL) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued (COPY) as to defendant Randolph and Nebraska City Council, The City of Randolph, Nebraska regarding Complaint - Pro Se #1 . (MKR) |
Filing 3 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. Blank summons form given to plaintiff. (MKR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Randolph, Nebraska City Council and The City of Randolph, Nebraska; 2 Summons issued, with receipt number 8066981, in the amount of $ 402; filed on behalf of Plaintiff Kandice Cooke. (MKR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.