Cano v. Guaca Maya, Inc. et al
| Hilario Cano |
| Guaca Maya, Inc. and Claudia Cano-Robles |
| 8:2023cv00265 |
| June 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
REPLY BRIEF in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss #7 by Attorney Brian T. McKernan on behalf of Defendants Claudia Cano-Robles, Guaca Maya, Inc..(McKernan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 9
BRIEF in opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss #7 by Attorney Carlos J. Anaya on behalf of Plaintiff Hilario Cano.(Anaya, Carlos)
|
|
Filing 8
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Alexander K. Shaner on behalf of Defendant Guaca Maya, Inc..(Shaner, Alexander)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss by Attorney Brian T. McKernan on behalf of Defendants Claudia Cano-Robles, Guaca Maya, Inc..(McKernan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT STRIKE ORDER that Pursuant to NEGenR 1.3(a)(4), the Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #4 is stricken for the following reason: incorrect document filed. The party is directed to re-file the document. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
|
|
Filing 5
BRIEF in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss #4 by Attorney Brian T. McKernan on behalf of Defendants Claudia Cano-Robles, Guaca Maya, Inc..(McKernan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 4
STRICKEN - MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss by Attorney Brian T. McKernan on behalf of Defendants Claudia Cano-Robles, Guaca Maya, Inc..(McKernan, Brian) Modified on 6/27/2023 to strike per order 6 (ADB).
|
|
Filing 3
TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Guaca Maya, Inc.. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (LKO)
|
|
Filing 2
TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL against Hilario Cano from District Court of Douglas County Nebraska, Case number CI 23-3482 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4884719) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Brian T. McKernan on behalf of Guaca Maya, Inc., Claudia Cano-Robles (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(McKernan, Brian)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
