Mastel v. Kijakazi
Amanda Mastel |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
8:2023cv00271 |
June 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Robert F Rossiter |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Filing No. #2 ). The Clerk of Court shall file the original complaint and the accompanying pleadings without the prepayment of costs or fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (JSF) |
Filing 4 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-13: In the Matter of Procedures for Social Security Cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (JES) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Attorney Wes Kappelman on behalf of Plaintiff Amanda Mastel.(Kappelman, Wes) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, by Attorney Wes Kappelman on behalf of Amanda Mastel (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kappelman, Wes) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.