United States of America v. $980,050.00 United States Currency
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| $980,050.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY |
| Ahmed Alrumaihi |
| 8:2023cv00363 |
| August 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting AMENDED by Attorney Kimberly C. Bunjer on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America.(Bunjer, Kimberly) |
| Filing 16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Kimberly C. Bunjer on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America.(Bunjer, Kimberly) |
| Filing 15 Verified CLAIM by Ahmed Alrumaihi (Amarin, Matthew) |
| Filing 14 RETURN of service of Notice of Judicial Forfeiture Proceeding and a copy of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem on August 16, 2023 upon Ahmed Al-Rumaihi by Attorney Kimberly C. Bunjer on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America.(Bunjer, Kimberly) |
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER - CONSENT Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 10/10/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (JES)
|
|
Filing 12
RESTRICTED TELEPHONE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS AND ORDER. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (RMW)
|
| Filing 11 TEXT ORDER granting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice #10 for attorney Haytham Faraj. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LKO) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ANEDC-4935147 by Attorney Haytham Faraj on behalf of Defendant $980,050.00 United States Currency.(Faraj, Haytham) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Ahmed Alrumaihi (Amarin, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice #7 for attorney Matthew M. Amarin. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LKO) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ANEDC-4929388 by Attorney Matthew M. Amarin on behalf of Defendant $980,050.00 United States Currency.(Amarin, Matthew) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR PUBLICATION - This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Publication (Filing No. #5 ), filed by the United States of America. The Motion is granted and the United States is directed to publish such notification as requested. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (JES)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION FOR PUBLICATION by Attorney Kimberly C. Bunjer on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America.(Bunjer, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 WARRANT IN REM (COPY) Issued. (Copy e-mailed to USA) (JES) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM by Attorney Kimberly C. Bunjer on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America (Bunjer, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against $980,050.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY, by Attorney Kimberly C. Bunjer on behalf of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(Bunjer, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
