Holloway v. Wolman et al
Walter Holloway |
Wolman, Metro Bus, Omaha Public Schools and Non-Profit of Nepotism |
8:2023cv00389 |
August 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 9 CORRESPONDENCE filed on behalf of Plaintiff Walter Holloway. (MKR) |
Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to the Complaint - Pro Se #1 on behalf of Plaintiff Walter Holloway. (MKR) |
|
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to the MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 on behalf of Plaintiff Walter Holloway. (MKR) |
|
Filing 4 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (MKR) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY by Deputy Clerk that the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 and Complaint - Pro Se #1 has been filed and is considered deficient because the document is not signed. The plaintiff shall correct the deficiency within 14 days of the date of this entry or the pleading may be stricken from the record of this case. See NECivR 11.1.(MKR) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Walter Holloway.(MKR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metro Bus, Non-Profit of Nepotism, Omaha Public Schools and Wolman, no Summons issued, filed on behalf of Plaintiff Walter Holloway. (MKR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.