Sobansky v. Ravgen, Inc.
| Matthew Sobansky |
| Ravgen, Inc. |
| 8:2023cv00398 |
| September 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Cheryl R Zwart |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 30
TEXT ORDER granting #25 Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act. Filing Nos. 26, 28, and 29 are restricted to case participants and the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW)
|
| Filing 29 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Exhibit B regarding MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act #25 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). - by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Plaintiff Matthew Sobansky.(Buter, Victoria) |
| Filing 28 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Exhibit A regarding MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act #25 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). - by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Plaintiff Matthew Sobansky.(Buter, Victoria) |
| Filing 27 INDEX in support of MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4934945) #1 by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Plaintiff Matthew Sobansky. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Thomas Duston, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit D)(Buter, Victoria) |
| Filing 26 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena regarding MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act #25 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). - by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Plaintiff Matthew Sobansky.(Buter, Victoria) |
| Filing 25 MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Plaintiff Matthew Sobansky.(Buter, Victoria) |
|
Filing 24
TEXT ORDER granting #23 Movant's Unopposed Motion to Extend the deadline to file a reply brief as to the pending motion to quash to October 11, 2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW)
|
| Filing 23 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Time to File Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Plaintiff Matthew Sobansky.(Buter, Victoria) |
|
Filing 22
TEXT ORDER granting #11 Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act. Filing Nos. 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 are restricted to case participants and the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW)
|
|
Filing 21
REASSIGNMENT ORDER - The presiding judge in case 8:23CV398 has recused himself. See 28 U.S.C. 455. As this case is related to 8:23CV399, both cases are reassigned to District Judge Brian C. Buescher for disposition and remain assigned to Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (LKO)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER OF RECUSAL - I recuse myself from this case, and the Clerk shall refer this matter to the Chief Judge for reassignment. The Clerk shall refer case no. 8:23-cv-399, Ravgen, Inc. v. Kipp, to the Chief Judge for potential reassignment as a related case. Ordered by Senior Judge John M. Gerrard. (LKO)
|
| Filing 19 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Exhibit 15 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Defendant Ravgen, Inc.(Klaus, Daniel) Modified on 9/29/2023 to change restriction level per Order 22. (CEW). |
| Filing 18 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Exhibit 11 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Defendant Ravgen, Inc.(Klaus, Daniel) Modified on 9/29/2023 to change restriction level per Order 22. (CEW). |
| Filing 17 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Exhibit 10 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Defendant Ravgen, Inc.(Klaus, Daniel) Modified on 9/29/2023 to change restriction level per Order 22 . (JAB) |
| Filing 16 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Exhibit 7 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Defendant Ravgen, Inc.(Klaus, Daniel) Modified on 9/29/2023 to change restriction level per Order 22 . (JAB) |
| Filing 15 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Exhibit 6 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Defendant Ravgen, Inc.(Klaus, Daniel) Modified on 9/29/2023 to change restriction level per Order 22 . (JAB) |
| Filing 14 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Exhibit 5 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Defendant Ravgen, Inc.(Klaus, Daniel) Modified on 9/29/2023 to change restriction level per Order 22 . (JAB) |
| Filing 13 INDEX in opposition to MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4934945) #1 by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Defendant Ravgen, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 8, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 9, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 12, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 13, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 14)(Klaus, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Brief in Opposition to Motion to Quash ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a) by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Defendant Ravgen, Inc..(Klaus, Daniel) Modified on 9/28/2023 to unseal and restrict (CEW). |
| Filing 11 MOTION to file under Seal by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Defendant Ravgen, Inc..(Klaus, Daniel) Modified on 9/28/2023 to correct event type. (CEW). |
|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER granting #9 Respondent's Unopposed Motion to Extend the response deadline as to the pending Motion to Quash. (See Filing No. #1 ) The deadline is now September 27, 2023 and any reply shall be filed in accordance with the local rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW)
|
| Filing 9 JOINT MOTION to Extend time to respond to motion to quash by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Defendant Ravgen, Inc..(Klaus, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice #5 for attorney Brian D. Matty. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LKO) |
|
Filing 7
REASSIGNMENT ORDER - This case is related to case numbers 4:22CV3017 and 8:23CV399. See NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(C)(iii). Accordingly, pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(B), this case is reassigned to Senior District Judge John M. Gerrard for disposition and is assigned to Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (LKO)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Plaintiff Matthew Sobansky (Buter, Victoria) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ANEDC-4942437 by Attorney Brian D. Matty on behalf of Defendant Ravgen, Inc..(Matty, Brian) |
| Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 3 INDEX in support of MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4934945) #1 by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Movant Matthew Sobansky. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Matthew Sobansky, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Thomas Duston)(Buter, Victoria) |
| Filing 2 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4934945) #1 by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Movant Matthew Sobansky.(Buter, Victoria) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4934945), by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Matthew Sobansky(Buter, Victoria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sobansky v. Ravgen, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Ravgen, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Matthew Sobansky | |
| Represented By: | Victoria H. Buter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
