Kipp v. Ravgen, Inc.
Deborah S. Kipp |
Ravgen, Inc. |
8:2023cv00399 |
September 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Brian C Buescher |
Cheryl R Zwart |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER- On or before November 9, 2023, the parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal of this matter. Absent compliance with this order, this case may be dismissed without further notice. All pending motions are denied as moot. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR) |
Filing 23 STATUS REPORT by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Respondent Ravgen, Inc..(Klaus, Daniel) |
Filing 22 TEXT ORDER granting #21 Movant's Unopposed Motion to Extend the deadline to file a reply brief as to the pending motion to quash to October 23, 2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW) |
Filing 21 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Time to File Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena (Third) by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Movant Deborah S. Kipp.(Buter, Victoria) |
Filing 20 TEXT ORDER granting #19 Movant's Unopposed Motion to Extend the deadline to file a reply brief as to the pending motion to quash to October 19, 2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW) |
Filing 19 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Time to File Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena (SECOND) by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Movant Deborah S. Kipp.(Buter, Victoria) |
Filing 18 TEXT ORDER granting #17 Movant's Unopposed Motion to Extend the deadline to file a reply brief as to the pending motion to quash to October 12, 2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW) |
Filing 17 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Time to File Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Movant Deborah S. Kipp.(Buter, Victoria) |
Filing 16 TEXT ORDER granting #11 Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act. Filing Nos. 12, 14, and 15 are restricted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW) |
Filing 15 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Exhibit 9 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). - by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Respondent Ravgen, Inc..(Klaus, Daniel) |
Filing 14 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Exhibit 8 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). - by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Respondent Ravgen, Inc..(Klaus, Daniel) |
Filing 13 INDEX in opposition to MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4935868) #1 by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Respondent Ravgen, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 7)(Klaus, Daniel) |
Filing 12 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Brief in Opposition to regarding MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4935868) #1 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). - by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Respondent Ravgen, Inc..(Klaus, Daniel) |
Filing 11 MOTION to file under Seal by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Respondent Ravgen, Inc..(Klaus, Daniel) Modified on 9/28/2023 to change event type. (CEW). |
Filing 10 REASSIGNMENT ORDER - The presiding judge in case 8:23CV398 has recused himself. See 28 U.S.C. 455. As this case is related to 8:23CV399, both cases are reassigned to District Judge Brian C. Buescher for disposition and remain assigned to Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart for judicial supervision.Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (LKO) |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Respondent's Unopposed Motion to Extend the response deadline as to the pending Motion to Quash. (See Filing No. #1 ). The deadline is now September 28, 2023 and any reply shall be filed in accordance with the local rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW) |
Filing 8 JOINT MOTION to Extend to respond to motion to quash by Attorney Daniel E. Klaus on behalf of Respondent Ravgen, Inc..(Klaus, Daniel) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice #6 for attorney Brian D. Matty. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LKO) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ANEDC-4942450 by Attorney Brian D. Matty on behalf of Respondent Ravgen, Inc..(Matty, Brian) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Brian D. Matty has not registered for admittance to practice nor registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (JES) |
Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge John M. Gerrard and Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
Remark - Public (Related Case): This notice serves to advise the parties that a plaintiff noted this case as related to another pending or closed case in this court. If a case is noted as related on the cover sheet or case opening screen when filed, the clerk assigns it to the district judge who handled the earlier pending or closed case. See NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(B). Any challenge to operation of this rule must be made pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(7). (JES) |
Filing 3 INDEX in support of MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4935868) #1 by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Movant Deborah S. Kipp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Deborah Kipp, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Thomas Duston)(Buter, Victoria) |
Filing 2 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4935868) #1 by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Movant Deborah S. Kipp.(Buter, Victoria) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4935868), by Attorney Victoria H. Buter on behalf of Deborah S. Kipp(Buter, Victoria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kipp v. Ravgen, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Ravgen, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Brian D. Matty |
Represented By: | Daniel E. Klaus |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Deborah S. Kipp | |
Represented By: | Thomas L. Duston |
Represented By: | Victoria H. Buter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.