Robinson v. Boyce
Plaintiff: Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant: Taggart Boyce
Case Number: 8:2023cv00412
Filed: September 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Bataillon
Referring Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 JUDGMENT - PRO SE regarding Memorandum and Order #9 . This case is dismissed without prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
November 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #8 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
October 19, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION for Dismissal on behalf of Plaintiff Kirk D. Robinson.(NMW)
October 2, 2023 Filing 7 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Plaintiff Kirk D. Robinson. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (JAB)
October 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting #2 plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff Kirk D. Robinson shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $350.00 by November 1, 2023, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a written motion. Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for November 1, 2023: initial partial filing fee payment due. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party and institution)(JAB)
September 19, 2023 Filing 5 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. Letter sent to Kara Martin at Nebraska Department of Correctional Services. (MLF)
September 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MLF)
September 19, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (MLF)
September 15, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Kirk D. Robinson.(MLF)
September 15, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Taggart Boyce. No Summons issued, filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Kirk D. Robinson. (MLF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Boyce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kirk D. Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Taggart Boyce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?