Robinson v. Kopf et al
Plaintiff: Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant: Judge Richard Kopf, Richard Kopf and Joseph Bataillion
Case Number: 8:2023cv00452
Filed: October 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Bataillon
Referring Judge: Pro Se Docket
2 Judge: Robert F Rossiter
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (Filing No. #5 ) is granted. Plaintiff has paid the full amount of the Courts $350.00 filing fee and no further filing fee payments are due. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in Plaintiff's case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiffs claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(NMW)
December 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for a Change of Venue (Filing No. #7 ) is denied. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(NMW)
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REASSIGNMENT ORDER - Pursuant to the presiding judge's order of recusal (Filing No. #8 ), this case is reassigned to Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. for disposition and remains assigned to the pro se docket for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
November 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER - This matter is before the Court on the Court's own motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(5), which provides that any judge of the United States "shall... disqualify himself... [where] [h]e... [i]s a party to the proceeding...." The undersigned is named as a defendant in this matter and shall, and hereby does, recuse himself from the above-designated case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(5). Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
November 15, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for a Change of Venue on behalf of Plaintiff Kirk D. Robinson. (LKO)
November 15, 2023 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Richard Kopf and Joseph Bataillion filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Kirk D. Robinson. (LKO)
November 2, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Kirk D. Robinson. (1 exact copy received and placed in the shred box.) (JAB)
October 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is directed to either submit the remaining $52.00 administrative fee to the Clerks office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). Plaintiff must include the case number for this case (8:23CV452) on any document or payment he submits for filing in this case. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: November 27, 2023: Check for MIFP or payment of $52.00 administrative fee.Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copies mailed to pro se party as directed)(NMW)
October 20, 2023 TEXT ENTRY THAT FILING fee paid on behalf of Kirk D. Robinson on 10/20/2023. Receipt number 8068137, in the amount of $ 350.00. (JES)
October 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(NMW)
October 17, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (NMW)
October 17, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Richard Kopf filed on behalf ofKirk D. Robinson.(NMW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Kopf et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kirk D. Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge Richard Kopf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Kopf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Bataillion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?