Signal 88, LLC v. Pierro et al
| Signal 88, LLC |
| Jonathan Pierro, Ronald Manning and Royalty 92 |
| 8:2023cv00497 |
| November 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
TEXT ORDER granting #16 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall have an extension of time to January 11, 2024, to file a brief in reply as to their Motion to Dismiss #7 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 16 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Seth C. McCauley on behalf of Defendant Royalty 92.(McCauley, Seth) |
| Filing 15 INDEX in support of Brief #14 in Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer by Attorney Michael T. Eversden on behalf of Plaintiff Signal 88, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Shelley Aikins)(Eversden, Michael) |
| Filing 14 BRIEF in opposition to MOTION to Dismiss #7 by Attorney Michael T. Eversden on behalf of Plaintiff Signal 88, LLC.(Eversden, Michael) |
| Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Signal 88 Franchise Group, Inc for Signal 88, LLC. by Attorney Michael T. Eversden on behalf of Plaintiffs Signal 88, LLC, Signal 88 Franchise Group, Inc.(Eversden, Michael) |
|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER granting #11 Unopposed Motion to Extend. Plaintiff shall have an extension of time to December 28, 2023, to file a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #7 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 11 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Time to File Response to Motion to Dismiss MOTION to Dismiss #7 by Attorney Michael T. Eversden on behalf of Plaintiff Signal 88, LLC.(Eversden, Michael) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Seth C. McCauley on behalf of Defendant Royalty 92.(McCauley, Seth) |
| Filing 9 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss #7 by Attorney Robert W. Futhey on behalf of Defendant Ronald Manning.(Futhey, Robert) |
| Filing 8 INDEX in support of MOTION to Dismiss #7 by Attorney Robert W. Futhey on behalf of Defendant Ronald Manning. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Futhey, Robert) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Attorney Robert W. Futhey on behalf of Defendant Ronald Manning.(Futhey, Robert) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting 5 Unopposed Email Motion. The defendants shall have an extension of time to November 30, 2023, to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 5 UNOPPOSED TEXT EMAIL MOTION by counsel for the defendants requesting an extension of time to November 30, 2023, to file an answer or other responsive pleading. (SMN) |
| Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Plaintiff Signal 88, LLC. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(LRM) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Royalty 92. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(LRM) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against All Defendants from Douglas County District Court, Case number CI 23-7724 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4973659) with attached state court pleadingsRoyalty 92, Ronald Manning, Jonathan Pierro (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(McCauley, Seth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
