Levering v. District 41 of Omaha et al
Plaintiff: Dontavius Levering
Defendant: District 41 of Omaha, Police Chief O.PD. and Officer Bradford
Case Number: 8:2023cv00527
Filed: November 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Bataillon
Referring Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address with Clerk's Response Letter to Plaintiff on behalf of Plaintiff Dontavius Levering. (LKO)
January 22, 2024 Filing 6 RESTRICTED Supplement on behalf of Plaintiff Dontavius Levering. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LKO)
December 11, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Dontavius Levering. (LRM)
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM)
November 27, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (LRM)
November 27, 2023 Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY by Deputy Clerk that the Complaint - Pro Se #1 has been filed and is considered deficient because the document is not signed. The plaintiff shall correct the deficiency within 14 days of the date of this entry or the pleading may be stricken from the record of this case. See NECivR 11.1.(LRM) Modified on 12/12/2023 to reflect Deficiency Satisfied on 12/11/23(ADB).
November 27, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against District 41 of Omaha, Officer Bradford, Police Chief O.PD. filed on behalf of Dontavius Levering. (LRM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/11/2023: #1 Signed complaint) (LRM).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Levering v. District 41 of Omaha et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dontavius Levering
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: District 41 of Omaha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Chief O.PD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Bradford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?