Perkins v. Kellogg's
| Courtney Perkins |
| Kellogg's |
| 8:2023cv00542 |
| December 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
RESTRICTED CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (MKR)
|
|
Filing 12
CASE PROGRESSION ORDER - Depositions due November 4, 2024. The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. Planning Conference set for 11/6/2024 at 11:30 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (MKR)
|
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Jennifer J. Stocker on behalf of Defendant Kellogg's.(Stocker, Jennifer) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Kellogg's (Stocker, Jennifer) |
| Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice #7 for attorney Jennifer J. Stocker. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LKO) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Catherine L. Stegman on behalf of Defendant Kellogg's (Stegman, Catherine) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ANEDC-5003961 by Attorney Jennifer J. Stocker on behalf of Defendant Kellogg's.(Stocker, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Kellogg's on 12/19/2023. (JAB) |
| Remark - Public: CM/ECF NextGen e-filing request from pro se plaintiff Courtney Perkins. Access granted on 12/27/23. (JLS) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued (COPY) as to defendant Kellogg's regarding Complaint #1 . (NMW) |
|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. 1 blank summons form given to plaintiff. (JAB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kellogg's with receipt number 8068487, in the amount of $ 405.00 filed by Courtney Perkins. 1 blank summons provided to plaintiff. (JAB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Perkins v. Kellogg's | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Courtney Perkins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kellogg's | |
| Represented By: | Catherine L. Stegman |
| Represented By: | Jennifer J. Stocker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
