Riddle v. Omaha Public Schools
Justin Riddle and Justin E. Riddle |
Omaha Public Schools |
8:2023cv00547 |
December 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Michael D Nelson |
Robert F Rossiter |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Your Honor, While my esteemed colleagues across the aisle seek refuge in procedure, I come before this court in pursuit of a higher purpose - justice and truth. The Notice served a simple goal: clarifying agreed facts to streamline matters for this bench. Its intentions could not be more aligned with the interests of judicial economy my learned friends claim to uphold. Yet now they quibble semantics to delay transparency, contrary to due process principles which have guided this institution since its founding. Respectfully, I ask - what merits this obstruction, if not avoidance of the inevitable? As a pro se, small courtesies are my due under law. But more so as citizens tasked with democratic duty, we owe each other candor. If facts in the Notice raise no good faith dispute, establishing them now spares future burden. While rules guide our ship, they do not imprison her. This court holds discretion to steer our course as fairness demands. I have every confidence it will today, as precedents show modification furthers accessible, just outcomes all seek. My requests are equal parts clarion call for transparency and hand extended in spirit of cooperation. This is no battle to be won, but an opportunity to remedy misunderstanding through open dialogue. Our shared heritage compels nothing less. I therefore kindly ask this tribunal recognize the higher function served by establishing truths, and urge my peers to reciprocate in kind. Justice will be best served. on behalf of Plaintiff Justin E. Riddle (Riddle, Justin) |
Filing 12 OBJECTION to Notice (Other),,, #11 and Response by Attorney Steven D. Davidson on behalf of Defendant Omaha Public Schools.(Davidson, Steven) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of CLARIFICATION : As a self represented litigant, I was unaware that it was legal to lie in our replies to the Court. As such, I didn't realize that the defense was allowed to flatly lie in their responses to the Court. Attached, I have included a request to admit that the phone call with Ott is real. It seems apparent that by ignoring the facts, we are accepting an impossible lie. In my previous legal experience, if a party is allowed to ignore obvious things (like a spoiled document, or a recorded phone call), there's no way to have a fair and appropriate trial. As such, in the interest of justice, under Rule 36 of FRCP, it's appropriate for the defense to affirm or deny if the call is real. This will prevent flagrant lies without potential sanctions. Thank you. on behalf of Plaintiff Justin E. Riddle (Riddle, Justin) |
Filing 10 REPLY BRIEF in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction #6 by Attorney Steven D. Davidson on behalf of Defendant Omaha Public Schools.(Davidson, Steven) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on behalf of Plaintiff Justin E. Riddle (Riddle, Justin) |
Filing 8 INDEX in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction #6 by Attorney Steven D. Davidson on behalf of Defendant Omaha Public Schools. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of David J. Kramer)(Davidson, Steven) |
Filing 7 BRIEF in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction #6 by Attorney Steven D. Davidson on behalf of Defendant Omaha Public Schools.(Davidson, Steven) |
Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Attorney Steven D. Davidson on behalf of Defendant Omaha Public Schools.(Davidson, Steven) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Summons delivered by certified mail on December 20th, 2023 at 8:25 am on behalf of Plaintiff Justin E. Riddle (Riddle, Justin) |
Remark - Public: CM/ECF NextGen e-filing request from pro se plaintiff Justin Riddle (also known as Justin E. Riddle). Access granted on 12/20/23. Plaintiff's name was modified on this case to match the name on his PACER account. The plaintiff's name on the docket sheet now reflects Justin E. Riddle with an alias of Justin Riddle. (JLS) |
Filing 3 REASSIGNMENT ORDER This case is related to case number 8:23CV455. See NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(C)(iii). Accordingly, pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(B), this case is reassigned to Chief District Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. for disposition and remains assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. Blank summons form given to plaintiff. (LRM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Omaha Public Schools with receipt number 8068517 in the amount of $ 405; one blank summons form provided; on behalf of plaintiff Justin Riddle. (LRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.