Boehm v. Shore Funding Solutions Inc. et al
| Andrew Boehm |
| Shore Funding Solutions Inc. and John Doe 1 |
| 8:2023cv00561 |
| December 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Shore Funding Solutions Inc. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LKO) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
| Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Shore Funding Solutions Inc. regarding Complaint #1 . (Javitch, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Shore Funding Solutions Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANEDC-4998584), by Attorney Mark L. Javitch on behalf of Andrew Boehm (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Javitch, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
