King v. United State of America et al
| Nicholas E King and Nicholas E. King |
| United State of America and Connie Kallsen |
| 8:2024cv00009 |
| January 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction #8 by Attorney Eric W. Synowicki on behalf of Defendant United State of America.(Synowicki, Eric) |
| Filing 9 INDEX in support of MOTION to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction #8 by Attorney Eric W. Synowicki on behalf of Defendant United State of America. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Kimberly Herbst Declaration)(Synowicki, Eric) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction by Attorney Eric W. Synowicki on behalf of Defendant United State of America.(Synowicki, Eric) |
| Remark - Public: CM/ECF NextGen electronic filing request received from pro se plaintiff Nicholas E. King. Access granted on 2/7/24. (JLS) |
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER - Plaintiff has not submitted a response to Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time #4 . For good cause shown, the Court finds Defendant's motion should be granted. Accordingly, Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by March 4, 2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(LRH)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER - Defendant United States of America has filed a motion requesting a 45- day extension of its deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. (Filing No. #4 .) Defendant's current responsive pleading deadline is January 17, 2024. Based on Plaintiff's pro se status, the Court will stay Defendant's responsive pleading deadline to allow Plaintiff an opportunity to respond to Defendant's motion. Plaintiff shall file a response to the motion by January 25, 2024, indicating whether he has an objection to Defendant's motion and, if so, the basis for the objection. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
| Filing 5 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Eric W. Synowicki on behalf of Defendant United State of America.(Synowicki, Eric) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Substitution by Attorney Eric W. Synowicki on behalf of Defendants Connie Kallsen, United State of America (Synowicki, Eric) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION as to filing Notice of Notice of Removal by Attorney Eric W. Synowicki on behalf of Defendants Connie Kallsen, United State of America.(Synowicki, Eric) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against All Plaintiffs from Kimball County Court, Case number SC 23-11 with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Eric W. Synowicki on behalf of United State of America, Connie Kallsen (Attachments: #1 Kimball State Court Filings, #2 Certification)(Synowicki, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
