Kreeger v. Sarpy County Sheriffs et al
Plaintiff: Frank Edward Kreeger, III
Defendant: Sarpy County Sheriffs and Douglas County Jail
Case Number: 8:2024cv00043
Filed: February 5, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Bataillon
Referring Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2024 Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss Party Douglas County Jail on behalf of Plaintiff Frank Edward Kreeger, III. (JES)
March 27, 2024 Filing 13 LETTER and Clerk's Response filed on behalf of Plaintiffs Frank E. Kreeger, III. (MKR)
March 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time, Filing No. #12 , Case No. 8:24CV26; Filing No. #10 , Case No. 8:24CV43, is granted. Plaintiff shall have until June 26, 2024, to pay his initial partial filing fee of $144.74 in both of the above captioned cases. No further extensions shall be granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in both Case No. 8:24CV26 and Case No. 8:24CV43 using the following text: June 26, 2024: initial partial filing fee payment due. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
March 14, 2024 Filing 11 Mail Returned as Return to Sender addressed to Sarpy County Jail, Attn: Cindy Schwer 1208 Golden Gate Drive Papillion, NE 68046 regarding Memorandum and Order #8 . Mail resent to Sarpy County Jail, Attn: Larry Sellers 1206 Golden Gate Drive Papillion, NE 68046. (JES)
March 13, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension on behalf of Plaintiff Frank E. Kreeger, III. (TCL)
March 4, 2024 Filing 9 MOTION to Amend Amended Complaint #6 on behalf of Plaintiff Frank Edward Kreeger, III. (ADB)
February 27, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP, Filing No. #2 , is granted. Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $144.74 within 30 days, unless the Court extends the time in which he has to pay in response to a written motion. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff's institution must collect the additional monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and forward those payments to the Court. The clerk's office is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiff's institution. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: March 28, 2024: initial partial filing fee payment due. Plaintiff is advised that, following payment of the initial partial filing fee, the next step in Plaintiff's case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff's claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business and will address Plaintiff's pending motion for counsel at that time. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JES)
February 9, 2024 Filing 7 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. Letter sent to Cindy Schwer at Sarpy County Jail. (JES)
February 8, 2024 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Douglas County Jail, Sarpy County Sheriffs filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Frank Edward Kreeger, III. (JES)
February 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed/ to pro se party)(MKR)
February 5, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (MKR)
February 5, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel on behalf of Plaintiff Frank Edward Kreeger, III. (MKR)
February 5, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Frank Edward Kreeger, III. (MKR)
February 5, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Douglas County Jail and Sarpy County Sheriffs; no Summons issued, filed on behalf of Plaintiff Frank Edward Kreeger, III. (MKR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kreeger v. Sarpy County Sheriffs et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank Edward Kreeger, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sarpy County Sheriffs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?