Sentry Select Insurance Company v. Linder
Sentry Select Insurance Company |
Mitchell Alan Linder |
8:2024cv00049 |
February 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Michael D Nelson |
Robert F Rossiter |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RESTRICTED HEARING INSTRUCTIONS AND ORDER. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (MKR) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 5/1/2024.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (MKR) |
Filing 9 TEXT STRIKE ORDER that Pursuant to NEGenR 1.3(a)(4), the Answer #7 is stricken for the following reason(s): filed in error. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (MLF) Modified on 3/29/2024 to add text (MLF). |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with with jury demand by Mitchell Alan Linder (Guenzel, Cameron) |
Filing 7 STRICKEN - ANSWER to Complaint with with jury demand by Mitchell Alan Linder (Guenzel, Cameron) Modified on 3/28/2024 to strike per order 9 (MLF). |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Mitchell Alan Linder on 2/21/2024. (Bailey, Brian) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to defendant Mitchell Alan Linder. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JES) |
Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Mitchell Alan Linder regarding Corporate Disclosure Statement #2 . (Bailey, Brian) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 for Sentry Select Ins. Co. by Attorney Brian T. Bailey on behalf of Plaintiff Sentry Select Insurance Company.(Bailey, Brian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Mitchell Alan Linder ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANEDC-5027522), by Attorney Brian T. Bailey on behalf of Sentry Select Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bailey, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sentry Select Insurance Company v. Linder | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sentry Select Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Brian T. Bailey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mitchell Alan Linder | |
Represented By: | Cameron E. Guenzel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.