Daly Dejillas v. RAM, L.L.C. et al
Cailin Daly Dejillas |
Ralph Murdock, RAM, L.L.C. and Ralph Murdock, Jr. |
8:2024cv00075 |
February 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Susan M Bazis |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to defendant Ralph Murdock and RAM, L.L.C. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LKO) |
Filing 4 Summons Requested as to RALPH MURDOCK a/k/a RALPH MURDOCK, JR. regarding Complaint #1 . (Hultquist, Stacey) |
Filing 3 Summons Requested as to RAM, LLC regarding Complaint #1 . (Hultquist, Stacey) |
Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANEDC-5037900), by Attorney Stacey N. Hultquist on behalf of Cailin Daly Dejillas (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hultquist, Stacey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.