Young v. Wheelock et al
Marvin Young |
Wheelock and State of Nebraska |
Nebraska Attorney General |
8:2024cv00079 |
February 27, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 8 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. Letter sent to Kara Martin at Nebraska Department of Correctional Services. (TCL) |
Filing 7 COPY OF IFP MEMO prepared by Deputy Clerk regarding Interlocutory Appeal #6 that the appeal filing fee has not been paid and that the certificate of appealability is at issue has been sent to Pro Se Law Clerk as to Petitioner Marvin Young. (MKR) |
Filing 6 INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL regarding Memorandum and Order #3 . (MKR) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner Marvin Young. (MKR) |
Filing 4 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on behalf of Petitioner Marvin Young. (MKR) |
TEXT ENTRY THAT FILING fee paid on behalf of Marvin Young on 4/15/2024. Receipt number 8069409, in the amount of $ 5.00. (JES) |
|
Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (MKR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by pro se Petitioner Marvin Young. (MKR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.