United States of America v. $140,690.00 United States Currency et al
United States of America |
$140,690.00 United States Currency and 2019 Honda Civic |
8:2024cv00101 |
March 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Jacqueline M DeLuca |
John M Gerrard |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION for Publication by Attorney Kimberly C. Bunjer on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America.(Bunjer, Kimberly) |
Filing 4 WARRANT IN REM (COPY) Issued. (Copy e-mailed to USA) (JES) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge John M. Gerrard and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. DeLuca assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM by Attorney Kimberly C. Bunjer on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America (Bunjer, Kimberly) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against $140,690.00 U.S. Currency, 2019 Honda Civic, by Attorney Kimberly C. Bunjer on behalf of United States of America(Bunjer, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.