Mumin v. Case Manager Carroll et al
| Dukhan Mumin |
| Case Manager Carroll, Shaun Settles, Case Worker Moeshoeshoe, Case Manager Fricke, Evidence Custodian, Nebraska Department of Corrections, Scott Frakes, Doug Peterson and Nebraska Parole Board |
| 8:2024cv00131 |
| April 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LRM)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (LRM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Dukhan Mumin. (LRM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Case Manager Carroll, Case Manager Fricke, Case Worker Moeshoeshoe, Evidence Custodian(CCCO), Evidence Custodian(OCC), Scott Frakes, Nebraska Department of Corrections, Nebraska Parole Board, Doug Peterson, Shaun Settles filed on behalf ofDukhan Mumin. (LRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
