Lightfeather v. Nebraska Department of Corrections religous cordnator Rucker et al
Austin Edward Lightfeather |
Nebraska Department of Corrections religous cordnator Rucker, Nebraska Department of Corrections Director Robert Jeffreys, Nebraska Department of Corrections LPN Nuse Lori Decoster and Nebraska Department of Corrections Psychiatry Doctor PhD Shanan |
8:2024cv00181 |
May 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (LRM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nebraska Department of Corrections Director Robert Jeffreys, Nebraska Department of Corrections LPN Nuse Lori Decoster, Nebraska Department of Corrections Psychiatry Doctor PhD Shanan, Nebraska Department of Corrections religous cordnator Rucker filed on behalf ofAustin Edward Lightfeather. (LRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.