Lightfeather v. Battalion et al
| Austin Lightfeather |
| Federal Judge Joseph Battalion, Federal Judge John Gerrard, Federal Judge Charl Zwart, Defendants Federal Judges and Federal US District Clerk Denise Lucks |
| 8:2026cv00517 |
| September 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2025-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by District Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. Copy mailed to pro se party. (RMR)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (RMR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Judge Joseph Battalion, Defendants Federal Judges, Federal Judge John Gerrard, Federal US District Clerk Denise Lucks, Federal Judge Charl Zwart filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Austin Lightfeather. (RMR) Modified on 9/10/2026 to correct filing date (RMR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
