Gill v. Aranas et al
| Kevin Rohn Gill |
| Romeo Aranas, C. Brockway, Karen Gedney, Johns, Long, Manerlang, Mar, J. Perry and Walls |
| 3:2017cv00159 |
| March 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER - The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carla B. Baldwin (ECF No. 81 ) is accepted and adopted in full. The Court overrules Plaintiff's Objection (ECF No. 82 ). Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 71 ) is granted. Clerk is directed to enter judgment in Defendants' favor in accordance with this order and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/5/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting ECF No. 49 Motion to Extend Time : Romeo Aranas' answer/response to complaint due by 7/23/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 7/9/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting ECF No. 39 Motion to Extend Time :Dispositive motions due 45 days from the date that an answer is filed to the second amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 5/13/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 33 is accepted and adopted in full; Plaintiff's motion to file the SAC (ECF No. 29 at 1-2) is granted; the Clerk is directed to detach and file the SAC (id. at 3-15); Plaintiff& #039;s claim of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs under the Eighth Amendment will proceed against Defendants Aranas, Walls, and Does 1 through 10; Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Gedney, Mar, Long, Perry and Brockway are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/2/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting ECF No. 31 Motion to Extend the Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's "Requests for Interrogatories and Production of Documents Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 33 and 34". Deadline to respond to discovery 4/12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 3/4/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDERED P's # 1 Application to proceed IFP is GRANTED. However, even if this action is dismissed, the full filing fee must still be paid. NDOC shall pay Clerk from inmate account. Clerk shall SEND copy this Order to Finance and NDOC I nmate Services. ( E-mail (NEF) to Finance; Mailed to NDOC on 10/2/2018. ) Clerk shall SERVE this Order and Amended Complaint (ECF Nos. 6 ). upon AG. (E-service to AG on 10/2/2018; Amended Complaint via NEF regeneration.) AG shall a dvise by 10/23/2018. re acceptance of service; and file under seal addresses for Ds for which service not accepted. P shall file a motion re any unserved Ds. If AG accepts service, then answer to complaint due by 12/1/2018 Henceforth P shall serve Ds or Ds' counsel a copy of every document submitted, together with a certificate of service. This case is no longer stayed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 10/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER granting ECF No. 11 Motion to Extend Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 8/31/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
