Rodriguez v. Adamson et al
| Miguel A Rodriguez |
| Kim Adamson, Brian Ederton, Rosselle Donnelly, Michael Minev and Dana Marks |
| 3:2022cv00324 |
| July 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Craig S Denney |
| Anne R Traum |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Miguel A Rodriguez. (HKL) |
Filing 3
ORDERED Clerk shall send Plaintiff the approved form IFP application w instructions. (Form w instr attached hereto for distribution to P via LCC law library.) Fully complete IFP application, or $402 filing fee, due by 9/19/2022. Clerk shall retain the Complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 7/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (HKL) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (HKL) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
