Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Brown v. Adamson, et al.
as 25-730
Plaintiff:
JASON S. BROWN
Defendant:
KIM ADAMSON, DANA MARKS, CARROLL, First Name Unknown, Doctor and others
Esquivel v. Williams et al
as 3:2025cv00017
Defendant:
Erin Parks, Kenneth Williams, Dana Marks and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Esquivel
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Austin et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Defendant:
Medical Director, Utilization Panel, Kim Adamson and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez-Dominguez v. Yup et al
as 3:2024cv00425
Defendant:
Dr. Yup, Dana Marks, Erin Parks-Don and others
Plaintiff:
David Sanchez-Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crouch v. Parks et al
as 3:2024cv00417
Defendant:
Joseph Benson, Dana Marks, Erin Parks and others
Plaintiff:
Coleton R. Crouch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Marks et al
as 3:2024cv00312
Defendant:
Knight, James Dzurenda, Kenneth Willams and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Tyrone Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowry v. Ellis et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowry
Defendant:
Heather Ellis, Arrin Parks, Dana Marks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. SHEPPARD et al
as 1:2023cv21142
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN-CARIN MOORE
Defendant:
SUSAN M. SHEPPARD, CATHERINE APONE, ASHLI JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmer v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Markiece Palmer
Defendant:
Tim Garrett, David Rivas, Erin Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santana v. Revus et al
as 3:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Vincent Mark Santana
Defendant:
David Revus, Dana Marks and Erin Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
