Mendoza et al v. Daniels et al
Justin Mendoza and Roy Trost |
Director NDOC Charles Daniels, William Ruebart, Tasheena Cooke, David Drummond, Deborah Striplin, Mauro, Cornnut, Stubbs, Adams, Inspector Generals Office, Steve Sisolak, Aaron Ford, Secretary of State Cevaske and Charles Daniels |
3:2022cv00369 |
August 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Craig S Denney |
Anne R Traum |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION for Emergency Protection Order against retaliation to prevent seual victimization by Plaintiff Roy Trost. (HKL) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. ***Emergency motion previously filed in case.*** (WJ) |
Filing 4 ADVISORY LETTER to litigants. (HKL) |
Filing 3 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiffs Justin Mendoza, Roy Trost. (Image is identical to ECF No. #2 .) (HKL) |
Filing 2 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiffs Justin Mendoza, Roy Trost. Responses due by 8/30/2022. (HKL) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiffs Justin Mendoza, Roy Trost. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Motion to file joint complaint, #3 Motion for appointment of counsel, #4 Motion for permission to represent, #5 Motion for gender/pronoun recognition) (HKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.