Schlis et al v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Nancy Schlis and Simeon Schlis
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 1:2019cv01201
Filed: December 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Presiding Judge: Joseph A DiClerico
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2020 Filing 5 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order filed by Nancy Schlis, Simeon Schlis. (Taylor, R.)
January 10, 2020 NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Pretrial Conference set for 2/11/2020 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. Follow up on Discovery Plan 2/4/2020. Please note pursuant to Title 28 USC 636(c) and Local Rule 73.1, the parties may consent to have the case reassigned to the Magistrate Judge, but are free to withhold consent without adverse consequences.(kad)
January 9, 2020 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement by Target Corporation disclosing no parent company, no publicly traded company, and no merger agreement. (Lasna, Meredith)
January 9, 2020 Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint - New Case with jury demand filed by Target Corporation.(Lasna, Meredith)
December 4, 2019 Filing 2 Notice of Lawsuit/Waiver issued electronically as to Target Corporation. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the notice/waiver and all attachments in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (mc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/5/2019: #1 Notice ECF) (mc).
December 4, 2019 NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (mc)
December 3, 2019 Case assigned to Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. The case designation is: 1:19-cv-1201-JD. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc)
December 3, 2019 Filing 1 NEW CASE/ COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Filing fee $400, receipt number ANHDC-1900936 filed by Nancy Schlis, Simeon Schlis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Lawsuit, #3 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(Taylor, R.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schlis et al v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Schlis
Represented By: R. Peter Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Simeon Schlis
Represented By: R. Peter Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Meredith M. Lasna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?