MURPHY v. MARLIN BUSINESS SERVICES CORP. et al
| JOHN MURPHY |
| MARLIN BUSINESS SERVICES CORP., JOHN J. CALAMARI, LAWRENCE J. DEANGELO, SCOTT A. HEIMES, JEFFREY A. HILZINGER, MATTHEW J. SULLIVAN, J. CHRISTOPHER TEETS and JAMES W. WERT |
| 1:2021cv14118 |
| July 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Sharon A King |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JOHN J. CALAMARI, LAWRENCE J. DEANGELO, SCOTT A. HEIMES, JEFFREY A. HILZINGER, MARLIN BUSINESS SERVICES CORP., MATTHEW J. SULLIVAN, J. CHRISTOPHER TEETS, JAMES W. WERT. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (alb, ) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences RMB. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (alb, ) |
| Judge Renee Marie Bumb and Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King added. (dd, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN J. CALAMARI, LAWRENCE J. DEANGELO, SCOTT A. HEIMES, JEFFREY A. HILZINGER, MARLIN BUSINESS SERVICES CORP., MATTHEW J. SULLIVAN, J. CHRISTOPHER TEETS, JAMES W. WERT ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12657817) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JOHN MURPHY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Addendum to Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certification Pursuant to L.Civ. R. 11.2)(SMILOW, MARK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
