Cases 1 - 10 of 268
Ellis Jr. v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Guy Ellis Jr.
Defendant:
Angela Sandoval, John Tekin, Dea Zantow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roy v. Narayen et al
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, John Murphy, Daniel Durn and others
Gervat v. Narayen et al
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, Amy Banse Brett Biggs, Melanie Boulden and others
Cullen v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Fathi Mushapha Cullen
Defendant:
Jane Jones, John Holmstrom, John Vanderlaan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LENTZ v. MURPHY 3RD
as 3:2023cv22489
Plaintiff:
TREY LENTZ
Defendant:
ESQ. JOHN MURPHY 3RD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shah v. Narayen et al
as 1:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, Amy Banse, Brett Biggs and others
Nominal Defendant:
Adobe Inc.
Wynne et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv09955
Plaintiff:
Willis Wynne, Jonathan De Crescenzo, Scott Konig and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Pembroke Pines Firefighters & Police Officers Pension Fund et al v. Adobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09260
Plaintiff:
Pembroke Pines Firefighters & Police Officers Pension Fund, the City of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System and City of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System
Defendant:
Adobe, Inc., Shantanu Narayen, John Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Murphy v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2023cv05253
Plaintiff:
John Murphy
Defendant:
John Sanchez and Munoz Trucking Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
