JOHNSON v. MARSH et al
| LARRY O. JOHNSON |
| MARSH, E. WINTER, L. PINION, D. MATTHEW and E. NSO |
| 2:2010cv01945 |
| April 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Essex |
| Madeline C. Arleo |
| Susan D. Wigenton |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER reopening 10-1945, etc.; Pltf's letter shall be deemed mis-docketed as a result of Pltf's own erroneous reference to all three matter (10-1630, 10-1945 and 10-2265); this Memorandum Opinion & Order shall be dock eted in 10-1945, and also make a new and seperate enty on the docket, etc.; Pltf shall not make any further submission associated with his challenges raised in the Instant Matter (10-2265); no statement made in this Memorandum Opinion & Order shall b e construed as barring Pltf from raising his challenges(asserted in 10-1630 and 10-1945) by means of filing a new civil complaint, etc,; in the event Pltf elects to submit for filing such new complaint, Pltf's submission shall be accompanied by his filing fee or by a complete in forma pauperis application, etc.; Clerk shall administratively terminate this action, etc. Signed by Judge Faith S. Hochberg on 8/31/11. (jd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
