Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ashabae Entertainment, LLC v. Beazley USA Services, Inc., et al.
as 1:2026cv02984
Plaintiff:
Ashabae Entertainment, LLC
Defendant:
Beazley USA Services, Inc. and Clayton Marsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
ADAMS v. GUNDY et al
as 5:2026cv05799
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE ADAMS
Defendant:
CHIMENE VAN GUNDY, OUTSTANDING REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS, INC., EVERFLOW WEALTH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lynch
as 1:2026cv07584
Plaintiff:
Robert Lynch
Pretrial Service:
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
US v. Christopher Marsh
as 26-4450
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MARSH
Marsh v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2026cv07553
Plaintiff:
Adam Marsh
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, New York Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
US v. Christopher Marsh
as 26-4441
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MARSH
Marsh v. City of Mesquite Texas
as 3:2026cv02934
Plaintiff:
Danitra C Marsh
Defendant:
City of Mesquite Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McGriff v. Weston et al
as 1:2026cv01069
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. McGriff
Defendant:
Lakwann Weston, K. Marsh, D. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Washington State Department of Children Youth and Families, et al.
as 26-5374
Plaintiff:
ZY'ANDREA TUCKER
Defendant:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES, DCYFE, DCYFW, FEDERAL WAY POLICE DEPARTMENT, SHELLANE JENSON, Department of Children Youth and Families and others
Wilson v. Sherman, et al.
as 26-5371
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. WILSON
Defendant:
STUART SHERMAN, AMBER WILLIAMS, JAN LINES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
