NY MACHINERY INC. et al v. THE KOREAN CLEANERS MONTHLY et al
| NY MACHINERY INC. and KLEANERS LLC |
| THE KOREAN CLEANERS MONTHLY, JOHN CHUNG and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
| 2:2017cv12269 |
| November 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Bergen |
| Leda D. Wettre |
| Susan D. Wigenton |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
198
OPINION AND ORDER denying the 182 Motion for Summary Judgment. A Telephone Status Conference is scheduled for 5/26/2023 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. The parties shall file a joint letter, at least three days before the conference, advising of the status of settlement discussions and any other issues to be addressed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 5/17/2023. (wh)
|
|
Filing
123
OPINION AND ORDER awarding Plaintiffs $16,670 in legal fees, etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 11/13/20. (jc, )
|
|
Filing
83
OPINION & ORDER denying 79 Plaintiffs' application seeking to compel Defendants to translate documents served as part of Defendants' document production. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 1/6/20. (jc, )
|
|
Filing
40
LETTER OPINION, Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 1/14/2019. (JB,)
|
|
Filing
30
LETTER OPINION. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 11/20/2018. (dam, )
|
|
Filing
15
OPINION. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 05/31/2018. (ek)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
