Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Roberts et al v. Skin Cancer & Cosmetic Dermatology Center PC et al
as 4:2020cv00072
Defendant:
Skin Cancer & Cosmetic Dermatology Center, P.C., John Chung and Linda Chung
Plaintiff:
David G Roberts & Associates Incorporated and David G Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spencer v. chung
as 1:2020cv00598
Defendant:
john chung
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Maurice Spencer
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 203
Spencer v. Chung
as 1:2020cv00599
Defendant:
John Chung
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Maurice Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr
Alperstein et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11033
Plaintiff:
Kwong Cheung Cheung, Chuck Conwell, Naveed Chaundry and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Roberts et al v. Skin Cancer & Cosmetic Dermatology Center PC et al
as 2:2018cv03433
Plaintiff:
David G Roberts and David G Roberts & Associates Incorporated
Defendant:
John Chung, Skin Cancer & Cosmetic Dermatology Center PC and Linda Chung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NY MACHINERY INC. et al v. THE KOREAN CLEANERS MONTHLY et al
as 2:2017cv12269
Plaintiff:
NY MACHINERY INC. and KLEANERS LLC
Defendant:
THE KOREAN CLEANERS MONTHLY , JOHN CHUNG and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Harry Berroa v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 17-1505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY BERROA
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, FORT DIX FCI, HSA MS. M. BAKER and others
Sun v. XYZ Corporation d/b/a Zen Palate et al
as 1:2015cv10044
Plaintiff:
Zuoren Sun
Defendant:
XYZ Corporation, "John" Chung and John Doe and Jane Doe #1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv07834
Plaintiff:
CARL SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONOVAN TAYLOR, RN, WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
