RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Defendant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Case Number: 2:2019cv20097
Filed: November 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Edward S Kiel
Referring Judge: Kevin McNulty
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Letter request extending time for Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond by 2/21/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 12/6/2019. (ams, )
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Letter from Plaintiff to Judge Kiel. (ABRAHAM, ERIC)
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. served on 11/15/2019, answer due 12/9/2019. (ABRAHAM, ERIC)
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. served on 11/18/2019, answer due 12/9/2019. (ABRAHAM, ERIC)
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ld, )
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AO120 Patent/Trademark Form filed. (ld, )
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information - Parties are to be entered in all capital letters. Select the party if it is already in the system. . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (ld, )
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel added. (ps, )
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by ERIC I. ABRAHAM on behalf of RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE (ABRAHAM, ERIC).
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE identifying No Corporate Parent as Corporate Parent.. (ABRAHAM, ERIC).
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-10103766) with JURY DEMAND, filed by RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit AO 120)(ABRAHAM, ERIC).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Represented By: ERIC I. ABRAHAM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?