Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1739
Plaintiff:
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE and CF DYNAMIC ADVANCES LLC
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE and CF DYNAMIC ADVANCES LLC
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute et al v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and CF Dynamic Advances LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Roe v. RPI
as 1:2022cv00932
Defendant:
RPI and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Plaintiff:
J. Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barr v. Jackson et al
as 1:2021cv01037
Plaintiff:
Chloe Barr
Defendant:
Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson, Dr. Lee McElroy, Dr. Leslie Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
as 1:2020cv01359
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Not Classified By Court:
Terence P. O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Deecher et al v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
as 1:2020cv00498
Plaintiff:
Ethan Deecher and Grady Habicht
Defendant:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ford v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
as 1:2020cv00470
Plaintiff:
Morgan Ford
Defendant:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2019cv20097
Plaintiff:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
