MARTINEZ-BROOKS v. GARLAND et al
| DIANTHE MARTINEZ-BROOKS |
| BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, MERRICK GARLAND and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS |
| 2:2021cv11307 |
| May 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jessica S Allen |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 1156 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John T. Stinson, Jr on behalf of MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS (Stinson, John) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DIANTHE MARTINEZ-BROOKS. All Defendants. (ROLLINS, KARA) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ld, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12468321) with JURY DEMAND, filed by DIANTHE MARTINEZ-BROOKS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(ROLLINS, KARA) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
