IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 84 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ANTONIO RICARDO VILCHES v. LILIANE RAQUEL PETCHO
| DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
| IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 84 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ANTONIO RICARDO VILCHES v. LILIANE RAQUEL PETCHO |
| 2:2023cv17858 |
| September 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Andre M Espinosa |
| Esther Salas |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory; that Katerina Ossenova, Senior Trial Counsel for the U.S. Department of Justice, hereby is appointed Commissioner of this Court, to obtain by subpoena the requested evidence from Pershing LLC for transmission to the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Foreign Litigation, Office of International Judicial Assistance, for transmission to the National Court of First Instance in Civil Matters No. 84 in Buenos Aires, Argentina in Antonio Ricardo Vilches v. Liliane Raquel Petcho; that the Office of International Judicial Assistance shall provide Pershing LLC in Newark, New Jersey with a copy of this Order and the accompanying documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa on 10/13/2023. (ld, )
|
| Set Deadlines as to #1 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1782. Motion set for 10/2/2023 before Judge Esther Salas. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sm) |
| Judge Esther Salas and Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa added. (ps) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1782, filed by DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Memorandum, #5 Cover Letter, #6 Text of Proposed Order)(OSSENOVA, KATERINA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 84 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ANTONIO RICARDO VILCHES v. LILIANE RAQUEL PETCHO | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE | |
| Represented By: | KATERINA V. OSSENOVA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| In re: IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 84 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ANTONIO RICARDO VILCHES v. LILIANE RAQUEL PETCHO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
