UNITED STATES et al v. APPLE, INC.
| UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF MAINE, STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF VERMONT and STATE OF WISCONSIN |
| APPLE, INC. |
| 2:2024cv04055 |
| March 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael E Farbiarz |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 Antitrust Litigation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 STATEMENT DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR SERVICE UNDER LOCAL CIVIL RULE 101.1(f) by UNITED STATES. (LASKEN, JONATHAN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against APPLE, INC., filed by STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF VERMONT, UNITED STATES, STATE OF WISCONSIN, STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF MAINE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF ARIZONA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(LASKEN, JONATHAN) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Michael E. Farbiarz and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
