Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Stanfield v. Credit One Bank et al
as 3:2026cv00239
Plaintiff: Kevin Stanfield
Defendant: Credit One Bank, Messserli and Kramer, Resurgent Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Nebraska et al v. Heller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2026cv02214
Plaintiff: State of Nebraska, State of Alabama, State of Florida and others
Defendant: Zoe Heller and Circular Action Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. State of North Dakota et al
as 1:2026cv00193
Petitioner: Sheldon George Davis
Respondent: State of North Dakota and Joseph Joyce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mid Vermont Christian School v. Bouchey
as 26-1416
Plaintiff: MID VERMONT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, on behalf of itself and its students and its students' parents, T. S., by and through their parents and natural guardians, Nathaniel and Dawna Slarve, NATHAN PARTINGTON, individually and others
Defendant: WAITS RIVER VALLEY (UNIFIED #36 ELEMENTARY) SCHOOL BOARD, JENNIFER DECK SAMUELSON, in her official capacity as Chair of the Vermont State Board of Education, HEATHER BOUCHEY, in her official capacity as Interim Secretary of the Vermont Agency of Education and others
Petitioner: CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY, LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER, KOLLENE CASPERS and others
Amicus Curiae: SUTHERLAND INSTITUTE, EDCHOICE, INC., STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
AbbVie, Inc., et al v. Drew Wrigley, et al
as 26-1863
Plaintiff: AbbVie, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Allergan, Inc., a Delaware corporation and others
Defendant: Tanya L. Schmidt, in her official capacity as Board President of the North Dakota Board of Pharmacy, Carolyn Bodell, in her official capacity as Member of the North Dakota Board of Pharmacy, Tyler Lannoye, in his official capacity as Member of the North Dakota Board of Pharmacy and others
Appellant: American Hospital Association, 340B Health, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and others
United States of America v. State of Minnesota et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2026cv02456
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: State of Minnesota and Keith Ellison
Amicus Curiae: State of Iowa, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Petitioner: Government Accountability & Oversight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
CITIZENS COAL COUNCIL et al v. BURGUM
as 1:2026cv01348
Plaintiff: CITIZENS COAL COUNCIL, APPALACHIAN VOICES and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant: DOUG BURGUM
Petitioner: STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF ALABAMA, ALABAMA SURFACE MINING COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1276 Interior: Review of Agency Action
Air Alliance Houston, et al v. EPA, et al
as 26-1070
Petitioner: Air Alliance Houston, Alliance of Nurses for Healthy Environments, American Academy of Pediatrics and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Lee M. Zeldin, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: State of North Dakota, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Amicus Curiae: Government Accountability & Oversight
People of the State of New York et al v. Onemain Holdings, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2026cv02117
Plaintiff: The People of the State of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Colorado and others
Defendant: Onemain Holdings, Inc., OneMain Finance Corporation, OneMain Consumer Loan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
State of Missouri, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 26-1394
Plaintiff: State of Missouri, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant: Donald Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, Linda S. McMahon, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education and United States Department of Education

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?