Cases 1 - 10 of 18
People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05448
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party:
Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court:
ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
State of Utah et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv05227
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of New York, State of North Carolina and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Ireland Limited, Google Commercial Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v Wheeler
as 3:2020cv03005
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Maryland, City of New York and others
Defendant:
Andrew Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Amicus Curiae:
Duarte Nursery, Inc., North American Lake Management Society, Society for Ecological Restoration and others
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Alaska, State of Nebraska, State of Texas and others
Petitioner:
National Cattlemen's Beef Association, American Road and Transportation Builders Association, Edison Electric Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California et al v. Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff:
State of California , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
State of California et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2017cv07186
Plaintiff:
State of California , California Air Resources Board , State of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management , Katharine S. MacGregor and Ryan Zinke
Intervenor:
Western Energy Alliance and Independent Petroleum Association of America
Intervenor_dft:
American Petroleum Institute , Texas and State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
National Association of Wheat Growers et al v. Zeise et al
as 2:2017cv02401
Plaintiff:
Associated Industries of Missouri, Agribusiness Association of Iowa, National Corn Growers Association and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Lauren Zeise
Amicus Curiae:
State of Iowa, State of Indiana, The National Health Federation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kuklok v. State of North Dakota,Workforce Safety and Insurance
as 3:2014cv03480
Plaintiff:
Brendan Kuklok
Defendant:
State of North Dakota,Workforce Safety and Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Kuklok v. State of North Dakota et al
as 3:2014cv03450
Plaintiff:
Brendan Kuklok
Defendant:
State of North Dakota and Workforce Safety and Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
