SCHOEMAN et al v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY et al
| STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN and JOYANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN |
| OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, JUDICIAL SECURITY UNIT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, JOHANNA BARBA JONES, CHARLES CENTINARO, JASON D. SAUNDERS, MAURICE J. GALLIPOLI, CHIEF JUSTICE STUART RABNER, NEW JERSEY COURTS, COURT AND JUDICIAL SECURITY UNIT OF NEW JERSEY COURTS and ROBIN A. MORANTE |
| 3:2023cv20699 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Zahid N Quraishi |
| Rukhsanah L Singh |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SUBMISSION received from STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN and JOYANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN. (jal, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The documents filed in docket entries #4 , #9 , #11 , and #12 submitted by STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN and JOYANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN did not contain a proper signature. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE DOCUMENTS WITH PROPER SIGNATURES. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (km) |
| Filing 12 SUBMISSION received from STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN and JOYANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN regarding Bill of Rights and succeeding rights in the Constitution. (amv) |
| Filing 11 Submission received from STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN and JOYANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN. (jdg) |
| Filing 10 Memorandum of law by JOYANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN, STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(kht) |
| Filing 9 Submission received by JOYANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN, STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN (kht) |
| Filing 8 Memorandum of law by JOYANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN, STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Complaint, #4 Envelope)(jal, ) |
| Filing 7 Memorandum of law filed by Stephen Francis Schoeman. (jal, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by ANDREW D SPEVACK on behalf of CHARLES CENTINARO, COURT AND JUDICIAL SECURITY UNIT OF NEW JERSEY COURTS, JOHANNA BARBA JONES, ROBIN A. MORANTE, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, STUART RABNER, JASON D. SAUNDERS (SPEVACK, ANDREW) |
| Filing 4 Letter from STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN AND JOYANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(jdg) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by JOYANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN and STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN. (jdg) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (jjc, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CHARLES CENTINARO, COURT AND JUDICIAL SECURITY UNIT OF NEW JERSEY COURTS, MAURICE J. GALLIPOLI, JOHANNA BARBA JONES, JUDICIAL SECURITY UNIT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ROBIN A. MORANTE, NEW JERSEY COURTS, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, STUART RABNER, JASON D. SAUNDERS. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jjc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CHARLES CENTINARO, COURT AND JUDICIAL SECURITY UNIT OF NEW JERSEY COURTS, MAURICE J. GALLIPOLI, JOHANNA BARBA JONES, JUDICIAL SECURITY UNIT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ROBIN A. MORANTE, NEW JERSEY COURTS, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, STUART RABNER, JASON D. SAUNDERS ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number 14716) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JOYANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN, STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN.(jjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
