Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SCHOEMAN et al v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2023cv20699
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN and JOYANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN
Defendant:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, JUDICIAL SECURITY UNIT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, JOHANNA BARBA JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUBBY, ESQ. v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2023cv02842
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. CUBBY, ESQ.
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF PASSAIC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LAWHQ, LLC et al v. CENTINARO
as 3:2020cv00782
Plaintiff:
LAWHQ LLC and THOMAS ALVORD
Defendant:
CHARLES CENTINARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CRESCI v. MCNAMARA et al
as 2:2018cv16207
Defendant:
CHARLES CENTINARO, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS and TIMOTHY J MCNAMARA
Plaintiff:
PETER J. CRESCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe v. BCB Community Bank, et al
as 16-4394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
BCB COMMUNITY BANK
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY J. MCNAMARA, Individually, CHARLES CENTINARO, Individually and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS
Michele SimmsParris v. Mark Neary, et al
as 11-3517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELE M. SIMMSPARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK NEARY, CHARLES CENTINARO, JANICE RICHTER and others
GIANNINI et al v. ROSENBERG et al
as 1:2011cv03542
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS GIANNINI and JOSEPH ROBERT GIANNINI
Defendant:
BARRY W. ROSENBERG, JOHN M. PALM , CHARLES CENTINARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUNLEAVY v. GANNON et al
as 2:2011cv00361
Plaintiff:
HARRY DUNLEAVY
Defendant:
EDWARD GANNON , ALAN HANDLER , JOHN TONELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMSPARRIS v. NEARY et al
as 3:2010cv05492
Plaintiff:
MICHELE SIMMSPARRIS
Defendant:
MARK NEARY, CHARLES CENTINARO, JANICE RICHTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
