Gaddam et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Shweta Gaddam and Gopi Mara Koosham |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, UR Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Merrick Garland, Christopher Wray and Federal Bureau of Investigations |
| 1:2022cv00455 |
| June 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kea W Riggs |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case by All Plaintiffs (Kryzak, Heather) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Shweta Gaddam, Gopi Mara Koosham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Kryzak, Heather) |
| Summons Issued as to Federal Bureau of Investigations, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, UR Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Christopher Wray and U.S. Attorney (jg) |
| United States District Judge Kea W. Riggs and United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (jg) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8320601 re #1 Complaint filed by Shweta Gaddam, Gopi Mara Koosham (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Kryzak, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
