Gilmore v. Carey et al
| Furman Gilmore |
| Joseph Carey, Shania Yannonie, Andy Jones, Gregory Sager, Frascello, Youngblood, Donn, Auigar, Walter Hubicki and Donna Julianio |
| 1:2015cv00020 |
| January 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Columbia |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
DECISION & ORDER: It is Ordered that the # 72 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants' Hubicki and Juliano is GRANTED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 5/16/2017. (Copy served upon the pro se plaintiff via regular mail) (jmb)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER: It is Ordered that the # 64 Motion for Discovery; and # 66 Motion to Compel are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: (1) Defendants Carey and Yannone shall respond to Demands # 1(b) and to 1(e) only to theextent that the reports in question detail the arrest of the Plaintiff on January 11, 2012, and any force used or not used in connection with the arrest. The Court will not compel responses to Demands ## 1(a), (c), (d), (f), & (g). (2) Defendants Youngblood, Donn, and Auiga r shall respond to Demand # 2(c) only to the extent that the reports in question detail the arrest of the Plaintiff on January 11, 2012, and any force used or not used in connection with the arrest. The Court will not compel responses to Demands ## 2 (a), (b), & (d). (3) Defendants Jones, Gregory, Sager, and Frascello shall respond only to Demand # 3(c). (4) Defendants Hubicki and Juliano shall respond only to Demands ## 4(a), (b), (c), & (d). Pursuant to FED R. CIV. P. 72(a), the parties have fo urteen (14) days1 within which to file written objections to the foregoing discovery order. Such objections shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court. As specifically noted in Rule 72(a) [a] party may not assign as error a defect in the order not timely objected to.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 1/18/2017. (Copy served upon the pro se plaintiff via regular mail) (jmb)
|
|
Filing
60
DECISION & ORDER: It is Ordered that Defendant's # 40 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; # 42 Motion to Dismiss; and # 46 Motion to Dismiss are hereby DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/8/2016. {Copy sent to the pro se plaintiff by regular mail} (jmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
